ADOLATSIZ HUKM CHIQARISH UCHUN JAVOBGARLIK: O‘ZBEKISTON VA GERMANIYA
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstrak
Ushbu maqolada Oʻzbekiston va Germaniya qonunchiligida sudyalar tomonidan adolatsiz hukm chiqarish uchun javobgarlik institutlarining chuqur qiyosiy tahlili amalga oshirilgan. Tadqiqot davomida Oʻzbekiston Respublikasida sudyalar intizomiy javobgarligining konstitusiyaviy va qonunchilikdagi asoslari, Germaniyada rechtsbeugung jinoiy javobgarlik instituti hamda uning tatbiq etilishidagi muammolar, ikki mamlakat qonunchiligidagi oʻxshashliklar va farqlar hamda sudlov mustaqilligini ta’minlash va ayni paytda adolatsiz qarorlar uchun javobgarlik o‘rtasidagi muvozanatni saqlash masalalari atroflicha ko‘rib chiqilgan. Qiyosiy huquqshunoslik metodologiyasi asosida ikkala huquqiy tizimning afzalliklari va kamchiliklari aniqlanib, O‘zbekiston sud tizimini takomillashtirish bo‘yicha besh dolzarb amaliy taklif ishlab chiqilgan. Maqola nazariy jihatdan qiyosiy sud tizimi tadqiqotiga, amaliy jihatdan esa milliy sud islohotiga muhim hissa qo‘shadi.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Bo'lim
##submission.citations##
1. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Конституциясининг 130-моддаси ва 136-моддаси (Article 130 and Article 136 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan) // Lex.uz: https://www.lex.uz/acts/35869
2. Ўзбекистон Республикасининг "Судлар тўғрисида"ги Қонуни (Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Courts") // Lex.uz: https://www.lex.uz/docs/4598049
3. Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) § 339 Rechtsbeugung // Bundesministerium der Justiz: (Section 339 of the German Criminal Code (StGB) - Perversion of Justice // Federal Ministry of Justice:) https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__339.html
4. Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) Urteil vom 22.06.2000 – 5 StR 126/00 // BGH Rechtsprechung, (Federal Court of Justice (BGH) Judgment of 22 June 2000 – 5 StR 126/00 // BGH Case Law) beck-online.de
5. Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) Beschluss vom 08.05.2012 – 4 StR 153/12 // BGH Rechtsprechung, juris.de (Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decision of 08.05.2012 – 4 StR 153/12 // BGH case law, juris.de)
6. Fischer, Thomas. Strafgesetzbuch: StGB. 71. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck, 2024. – § 339 Rechtsbeugung, S. 2156-2164. (Fischer, Thomas. Criminal Code: StGB. 71st edition. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2024. – § 339 Perversion of Justice, pp. 2156-2164.)
7. Schönke, Adolf / Schröder, Horst. Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar. 30. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck, 2019. – § 339, Rn. 1-45 (Schönke, Adolf / Schröder, Horst. Criminal Code: Commentary. 30th edition. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2019. – § 339, para. 1-45).
8. Garoupa, Nuno / Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. – 328 p.
9. Hanretty, Chris. Comparative Judicial Independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. – 256 p.
10. Zweigert, Konrad / Kötz, Hein. Introduction to Comparative Law. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. – 714 p.
11. UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (1985) // United Nations: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-independence-judiciary
12. Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (2002) // United Nations: https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf
13. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. Rechtspflege: Strafgerichte 2023 // Destatis: (Federal Statistical Office of Germany. Justice system: Criminal courts 2023 // Destatis) https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Staat/Justiz-Rechtspflege/_inhalt.html
14. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий суди расмий веб-сайти (Official website of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan) // https://www.sud.uz
15. Ўзбекистон Республикасининг Жиноят кодекси, 231-модда. (Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Article 231). URL: https://www.lex.uz/docs/111457